Author |
Message |
![Top of page](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/tree_m.gif)
Bob Reynolds
Frequent User Username: bobreynolds
Post Number: 79 Registered: 8-2012
| Posted on Monday, 28 April, 2014 - 10:21: | ![Edit Post](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/tree_s.gif) ![Delete Post](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/delmsg.gif) ![View Post/Check IP](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/checkip.gif) |
A simple question, and probably a daft one. Is it permitted to replace the inner headlamps with the same units as the outer ones? Then you would have 4 main beams, and also 4 dipped beams. This is such an obvious idea that I think there must be some law against it, otherwise everybody would have done it! |
![Top of page](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/tree_m.gif)
gordon le feuvre
Experienced User Username: triumph
Post Number: 32 Registered: 7-2012
| Posted on Saturday, 03 May, 2014 - 05:48: | ![Edit Post](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/tree_s.gif) ![Delete Post](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/delmsg.gif) ![View Post/Check IP](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/checkip.gif) |
From what I recall, the inner lamps are effectively spotlights where as the main beam of the outer two are more "general" main beam light |
![Top of page](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/tree_m.gif)
Bob uk Unregistered guest Posted From: 94.197.122.71
| Posted on Friday, 09 May, 2014 - 08:38: | ![Edit Post](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/tree_s.gif) ![Delete Post](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/delmsg.gif) ![View Post/Check IP](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/checkip.gif) |
In the UK yes it is ok But it is Pointless because four dip beams with street lights will not make vision any better Plus is the wiring going to be ok
(Message approved by david_gore) |
![Top of page](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/tree_m.gif)
Bob Reynolds
Frequent User Username: bobreynolds
Post Number: 82 Registered: 8-2012
| Posted on Sunday, 11 May, 2014 - 01:50: | ![Edit Post](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/tree_s.gif) ![Delete Post](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/delmsg.gif) ![View Post/Check IP](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/checkip.gif) |
Thank you for your response. It is not pointless, because dipped headlights are also used in total darkness, where there is other traffic in front of you (which is most of the time). In fact there is a big difference switching from 4 main beams down to 2 dipped beams; and I would have thought that 2 extra dipped beams would make a big difference. I haven't done this mod, I was just wondering whether it was allowed. In fact, after posting my original post I looked in other classic car forums to try and throw some light on the subject! The various UK lighting regulations are somewhat confusing, but it appears that cars built before April 1991 can have any number of dipped headlights as long as they are adjusted so as not to dazzle or confuse, whereas those built after that can only have two. Some MOT inspectors don't like them, just assuming they are illegal, so best to disconnect them for the MOT to save any arguments. As to whether the inner headlights are spotlights or not, I don't know. It's a valid point. But personally, I would prefer to have 2 extra dipped beams rather than 2 spotlights that are hardly ever used. And as for the wiring, I've discussed that in another topic. It appears to me that the wiring is not even OK for the standard headlamps, and nobody has disputed my calculations (yet). |
![Top of page](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/tree_m.gif)
Jan Forrest
Grand Master Username: got_one
Post Number: 541 Registered: 1-2008
| Posted on Sunday, 11 May, 2014 - 22:57: | ![Edit Post](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/tree_s.gif) ![Delete Post](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/delmsg.gif) ![View Post/Check IP](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/checkip.gif) |
For more light on dipped beam it's a simple job to replace the bulbs with single 100 watt or dual 100/90 watt xenon type(s). Illegal in the UK, of course, but I've never had a car fail the MOT when fitted with them. |
![Top of page](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/mark_top.gif) ![Previous message](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/mark_up.gif) ![Next message](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/mark_down.gif) ![Link to this message](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/tree_m.gif)
Bob uk Unregistered guest Posted From: 94.197.122.86
| Posted on Saturday, 17 May, 2014 - 06:56: | ![Edit Post](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/tree_s.gif) ![Delete Post](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/delmsg.gif) ![View Post/Check IP](http://au.rrforums.net/forum/icons/checkip.gif) |
The mot test does not test the wattage of lights They must only check what is in the manual There is a catch all section but this is used only for dangerous stuff which the manual does not cover Such as a loose roof rack Bright lights are not dangerous unless the aim is wrong than it fails on the aim I have seen this mod before and the lit area in front of car was about the same
(Message approved by david_gore) |